Whet vs BettorEdge: two routes to +EV.
BettorEdge is a peer-to-peer exchange — you get +EV by betting other users at no-vig, user-set prices. Whet is a scanner — you get +EV by finding mispriced lines across 25+ sportsbooks you already use.
Exchange model vs scanner model.
Both chase the same thing — a price better than the true probability. BettorEdge gets there by removing the house vig entirely: you set your own line and another user takes it, so there's no sportsbook margin to overcome. That needs a counterparty and enough marketplace liquidity to fill your bet. Whet gets there by leaving the books priced as they are and finding the ones that are already wrong — no counterparty needed, but you place the bet at your own sportsbook.
Why the consensus gate changes the math.
On a peer-to-peer exchange the price you get is whatever another user will take. There is no book margin to strip and no book to get limited by — but there is also nothing telling you whether the number in front of you is a good one.
That is the whole job Whet does before a pick reaches your board. Shin de-vigging strips the book margin using both sides of the market, so the fair line comes from the market and not from one price. Then the pick has to clear the consensus gate: at least three independent books have to be pricing the same side within two points of implied probability of the best price on offer, a test fitted on 21,782 graded MLB picks. On player props, a quote more than 15 cents off the other books is marked stale and scored down, and Score My Bet runs the same check.
Use the exchange to place the bet if the fill is better. Use Whet to know which bet is worth placing, and to hold us to it: every pick is published, graded and dated on the proof page.
Two routes. Pick your lane?
If you want to bet peer-to-peer at no-vig prices, BettorEdge's exchange is a clean model. If you want to find +EV at the books you already use, Whet scans 25+ of them for you.